Chicago Referencing †Citing a Conference Paper (Footnotes)

Chicago Referencing – Citing a Conference Paper (Footnotes) Chicago Referencing – Citing a Conference Paper (Footnotes) Conference proceedings are a great resource for students. And since academics attend conferences to discuss cutting-edge research, proceedings often include exciting new ideas. But how do you cite a conference paper? In this post, we explain this using Chicago footnote referencing. Footnote Citations In Chicago referencing, always give full publication information in the first footnote citation. For a published conference paper, this includes: n. Author’s Name, â€Å"Paper Title,† in Title of Proceedings, ed. Editor Name(s) (Place of Publication: Publisher, Year), page number(s) for cited section. In practice, then, the first citation of a conference paper would look like this: 1. Bill Riker, â€Å"Innovations in Seating,† in Proceedings of the Third Annual Behavioral Adaptations for Interstellar Travel Conference, ed. Jonathan Frakes (Santa Monica, CA: TNG Inc., 1987), 184. The format differs slightly for an unpublished paper (e.g., one that you saw presented in person). This is quite rare, but if you need to cite one, you need to include the following information in the first footnote: n. Author’s Name, â€Å"Paper Title† (paper presented at Name, Location and Date of Conference), page numbers (if relevant). An unpublished paper would therefore be presented like this: 2. Deanna Troi, â€Å"Feeling Change: Design Guided by Empathy† (paper presented at The International Conference of Feeling, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, June 20-22 1992, 21. For repeat citations of a paper, you can use a shortened footnote format. Bibliography The information to include in your bibliography for a conference paper is roughly the same as in the first footnote. However, there are a few differences. For a published paper, the format is: Surname, First Name. â€Å"Paper Title.† In Title of Proceedings, edited by Editor Name(s), page range. Place of Publication: Publisher, Year. For an unpublished conference paper, meanwhile, the format is: Surname, First Name. â€Å"Paper Title.† Paper presented at Name, Location and Date of Conference. In practice, then, we would list a published and an unpublished conference paper as follows: Riker, Bill. â€Å"Innovations in Seating.† In Proceedings of the Third Annual Behavioral Adaptations for Interstellar Travel Conference, edited by Jonathan Frakes, 180-201. Santa Monica, CA: TNG Inc., 1987. Troi, Deanna. â€Å"Feeling Change: Design Guided by Empathy.† Paper presented at The International Conference of Feeling, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, June 20-22 1992.

COMPARRE AND CONTRAST Example

COMPARRE AND CONTRAST Example COMPARRE AND CONTRAST – Term Paper Example When trying to compare and contrast my story of the cheerleading experience and my mates academic experience, I see many similarities and differences between the two situations.Both groups were working on a specific and clear subject, were aiming to achieve something primarily, were hoping to succeed and accomplish their goal or mission, if you will. For the cheerleading team, it was (originally) attaining and maintaining a new cheerleading group in my high-school and making it a success. In the academic experience my classmate describes, he was working on a 35 page project with other students during his first semester as a graduate student.The forming stage in the two situations can be deemed as quite similar. Both my cheerleading group and his student group received an explanation as to what is expected of them and were explained the details they needed to know.Then, as both these situations evolve, their distinct differences are becoming apparent. While my classmates student group got along and continued the project well and their instructor was wonderful, gave them all the details and made sure no one had any questions, my cheerleading group was facing great difficulties due to the clash between the head-cheerleader and another one who were fighting over control of the group. Our storming stage was full of conflict and disarray whereas the other groups was quite peaceful. They cooperated in order to solve the problem they had and worked in order to achieve their mutual goal, and were successful of it. Our team also worked together in order to solve its problem but it was more difficult and prolonged.Eventually, both my classmate and myself have learned and gained a lot out of our group experience, and the things weve learned stay with us today and help us cope with our difficulties or challenges much better, in a more relaxed and efficient way.